One of the primary concerns is that a constitutional convention could have an unpredictable outcome. Once convened, there is no way to limit the scope of the convention, and delegates could potentially address a wide range of constitutional issues, not just the ones initially intended.

Some worry that a convention could lead to proposals that threaten existing constitutional rights or protections. Amendments might be proposed that could alter the balance of power between the federal government and states or affect individual rights.

The United States has not had a constitutional convention since the original Constitutional Convention in 1787. The lack of precedent raises uncertainties about the rules, procedures, and potential consequences of such a gathering.

​

Concerns exist about the potential influence of special interest groups or powerful entities on the convention's proceedings. Critics worry that these groups could shape the debate and outcomes to their advantage.

​

In today's political climate, there is concern that a constitutional convention could be highly polarized, with delegates representing extreme viewpoints. This polarization could make it challenging to reach consensus on proposed amendments.

The lack of clear guidelines in the Constitution about how a convention would operate raises questions about its procedures, the selection of delegates, voting mechanisms, and other logistical matters.